by Laurent Glatz – for Athletic Carnivore
The Patient Changes Faster Than the Interpretation Framework
On a carnivore diet, your blood test results can shift. The problem isn’t always the change itself—it’s often how that change is interpreted.
Some people feel better than before: less hunger, fewer energy crashes, reduced bloating, improved energy, better sleep, smaller waist circumference, falling triglycerides, rising HDL, more stable blood sugar, and lower insulin. Yet they leave the doctor’s office with a sentence that unsettles them: “Your tests are worsening.”
Why? Because one number moved. Often LDL. Sometimes urea. Sometimes creatinine. Sometimes T3. And all the improvements in the overall metabolic terrain vanish behind a single alarm.
This is where the real question begins: Is your doctor reading your results as if your body still runs primarily on sugar, or as a body that has switched fuel?
A Low-Carb Body Produces Different Markers
A body fueled mainly by glucose and a body adapted to fat do not operate under the same hormonal context.
On a high-carb diet, insulin is stimulated more frequently. The liver processes more glucose. Triglycerides can rise. Visceral fat settles more easily. Blood sugar fluctuates more. In a well-managed carnivore or low-carb context, insulin demand decreases, lipolysis becomes more accessible, triglycerides often drop, HDL can increase, and the liver may exit a state of glucose-fructose overload.
This shift in metabolic terrain changes the meaning of certain numbers.
An elevated LDL in an insulin-resistant, inflamed person with high triglycerides, low HDL, unstable blood sugar, and elevated CRP tells a very different story than an elevated LDL in a lean, active person with low triglycerides, high HDL, low insulin, low CRP, and stable energy.
Same apparent number. Different terrain. Different interpretation.
The Pitfall of Isolated LDL
LDL is often the panic point. But in many panels, LDL-C isn’t directly measured—it’s calculated. This distinction is crucial, especially in low-carb individuals who sometimes have very low triglycerides and high HDL.
A calculated number can be useful, but it must not become an absolute truth. You need to know how it was obtained. You must look at non-HDL cholesterol, ApoB if available, triglycerides, HDL, inflammation, insulin, blood sugar, thyroid context, family history, and the overall metabolic terrain.
The problem isn’t denying cardiovascular risk. The problem is reducing a person to a single LDL value.
Athletic Carnivore does not advocate blindness. It advocates hierarchy. A blood panel cannot be read through a single value.
Normal Blood Sugar Doesn’t Mean a Healthy Metabolism
The true heart of a carnivore or low-carb panel should often start elsewhere: fasting blood sugar, fasting insulin, HbA1c, triglycerides, HDL, waist circumference, blood pressure, ultrasensitive CRP, liver enzymes.
Blood sugar alone is insufficient. A “normal” blood sugar maintained by very high insulin can mask an already troubled metabolic terrain. Conversely, a slightly higher morning blood sugar in a very low-carb person, with low insulin and good other markers, may reflect a different context—sometimes related to the dawn phenomenon or an energy adaptation.
Again, it all depends on the terrain.
Fasting insulin is often far more telling than commonly believed. It reveals the hormonal pressure required to maintain blood sugar. If this pressure decreases while energy, waist circumference, and triglycerides improve, the story is different.
T3, Thyroid, and Energy Economy
The thyroid is another often misunderstood point. On low carb or carnivore, T3 can sometimes drop. Some immediately see this as thyroid collapse. Yet a lower T3 in a context of stable energy, normal temperature, good sleep, absence of symptoms, and reduced inflammation does not mean the same as a low T3 with fatigue, cold intolerance, constipation, depression, weight gain, and general slowing.
The body can become more economical when running on less glucose and more fat. But this adaptation must be distinguished from true hypothyroidism.
Again, you must look at TSH, free T4, free T3, symptoms, actual calorie intake, stress level, sleep, cortisol, training, and whether weight loss is too rapid or not.
The number alone is not enough.
Urea, Creatinine, and Protein Fear
Fear that protein destroys kidneys often resurfaces. On carnivore, urea can rise because protein intake increases. Creatinine can be higher in a muscular, trained person or someone eating a lot of meat. The eGFR calculated from creatinine should therefore be interpreted cautiously depending on context.
This doesn’t mean ignoring the kidneys. They must be read correctly. Creatinine, urea, eGFR, possibly cystatin C, electrolytes, blood pressure, symptoms, hydration, and renal history provide a far more useful picture than automatic panic.
A body eating more protein should not be read as a sick body by default.
Electrolytes, Uric Acid, and Adaptation
A carnivore or low-carb transition also changes water and electrolytes. When insulin drops, the kidney retains less sodium. This is one reason some people feel tired, weak, nervous, or prone to cramps at first: they may not necessarily lack carbs but sometimes lack salt, magnesium, or proper hydration adjustment.
Uric acid can also fluctuate during adaptation. This deserves serious reading, especially with a history of gout. But an isolated variation without symptoms amid a profound metabolic shift should not be read as an automatic condemnation.
Reading a Living Body, Not a Statistical Norm
This is exactly the kind of difference the Athletic Carnivore questionnaire seeks to detect: not just what you eat, but how your body responds, compensates, recovers, and demands.
A blood test is not a punishment. It’s a map. But a poorly read map can cause unnecessary fear or false reassurance.
Carnivore and low carb change the context: less carbs, less insulin, more lipolysis, more fat utilization, sometimes more lipid transport, more protein, less water retention, different thyroid dynamics, different electrolyte balance.
The real question is not: “Do my numbers look like those of a carb-dependent population?” The real question is: “Is my biological terrain becoming more coherent, more stable, less inflammatory, more efficient, and better interpreted?”
The danger is not having changing blood tests. The danger is having them read by someone who doesn’t see that you have changed fuel.
Discussion around this article
Ask a question or add your feedback directly below the article. The comment appears on the page and can be removed from the admin area if needed.
No comment published yet. Start the discussion.